Raging pug?
Raging Bull is another one of those “classic” movies the film-fags love. Just take a look at this quote from a professional film critic. It pretty much sums up everything the film-fags think about this movie: “An essential addition to the libraries of all true cinephiles, the film is a triumph both for De Niro and his director, Martin Scorsese.”
It’s amazing to me that these fuckers loved this piece of shit so much. It also amazes me how film-fags refer to themselves as “cinephiles,” which is one of the most pretentious -sounding things I’ve ever heard. These people probably sit around in their skinny jeans, berets and striped shirts, smoking cigarettes, eating baguettes, and talking in fake French accents about how their taste in movies runs so much deeper than that of the average person.
Unfortunately, I don’t have the capability to express in words how much this movie sucks ass. The English language doesn’t have strong enough curse words to truly convey my hatred for Raging Bull. So, I decided to illustrate my reactions to the viewing experience by showing you pictures of pugs.
1) Anticipating watching the movie.
2) Getting the DVD from Netflix.
3) Beginning the movie / first boxing scene.
4) There doesn’t seem to be a lot going on…
5) OK, this movie is slower than I had expected.
6) I’m getting bored now.
7) Super fucking bored, how much longer is this movie anyway?
8) I’ll go get a snack, that will help my boredom.
9) Still hungry, time for some potato chips.
10) Nothing’s haaappeniiing…
11) ZZZZZZZZZZ
12) ZZZZZZZZZZ
13) ZZZZZZZZZZ
14) Holy shit! I woke up and realized what a fucking awful movie this is!
15) Maybe I’ll watch something better like Conan the Barbarian.
16) All right, now this is a good movie.
As you can see, yet another “classic” film has turned out to be a boring, bloated, overwrought turd. There must be some kind of conspiracy out there, where critics get together and label crap as “classic” and then get a good fucking laugh over how people will watch shitty movies and pretend to profess their love for them. This movie is trash, and should be avoided by all humans and pugs alike.
Verdict: Shitty
Of course not everyone agrees… for a counterpoint, check out “Movies that Everyone Should See: Raging Bull” at Fogs’ Movie Reviews. We released our reviews concurrently, so be sure to check it out.
Check out these other entries in the Classically Shitty series:
Foiled again by the unassailable wisdom of the Brik. Damn it! Why didnt I take into account the effect this movie had on small dogs? What was I thinking?
Conan is a FAR superior film, of course.
It’s sort of an unfair comparison as Conan the Barbarian is superior to just about everything.
boxing? you should check out sum Ippo, yo.
I’ve heard good things, but haven’t gotten around to it since I’m lazy.
I gotta side with Fogs on this one. I did enjoy this review quite a bit though.
Well there’s a shocker. LOL. The important thing is that you enjoyed the review. I can guarantee there is no other Raging Bull review anywhere out there like this one.
LOL. That is certainly true.
What should I feed my pug other than butt pills, cigeratte ashes and beer?
You can feed your pug the same thing you would feed any other breed of dog: garbage, poop, vomit, etc. Dogs will eat anything.
I think I found the perfect article/site for you, since you hate “film-fags” so much:
http://insomnia.ac/commentary/on_the_genealogy_of_art_games/
http://culture.vg/
Written/run by Alex “icycalm” Kierkegaard, who has a firm grasp on philosophy; especially that of the late Friedrich Nietzsche.
This really doesn’t have anything to do with movies, since it’s a video game site. Let’s be honest, this is your website, isn’t it?
hahahahaha no
Here, maybe these will help better:
http://insomnia.ac/commentary/for_artfags_only/
http://insomnia.ac/commentary/massage_my_ass/
http://insomnia.ac/commentary/are_u_an_artfag/
Read any one of these articles. Do you see any parallels between the “artfags” that icycalm raves on about, and the “film-fags” that YOU rave on about?
I don’t know if I see a lot of parallels. To me, “filmfags” is really a term of endearment. I love those guys, I really do. It’s just that they spout a bunch of nonsense about how movies are some amazing artform, and when they do they come off as absurd and pretentious. But I like them.
well the person who writes this blog knows how to attract people like me onto this page.
worthless cunt whose blog relies on ‘shit’ movies and the ‘cinephiles’ who love them.
you don’t like raging bull, i fucking get it. didnt need to read 98% with some fucking dog which you clearly went to some sort of effort to get into position.
and before you assume im sort of raging bull cheerleader i havent said anything of my thoughts in this comment about the movie. your blog, and the worthless wankers who comment approvingly actively seek to criticize anything and everythin and they are the worst sort of people.
I agree that we definitely are the worst sort of people. When you compare the readers of this blog to child molesters, terrorists, and Republicans, we rank far lower than any of them.
If you had bothered to read this post, which you clearly didn’t, you would notice that all of these dogs are different. You can easily find these pictures on the Internet with minimal effort.
The fact that this particular post got you mad is hilarious considering it is easily one of the least offensive things I have ever written. If you got this offended by seeing pictures of dogs in a review of a movie you like, well, I hope no one ever insults you in real life, as you will probably end up killing yourself.
As a parting comment, you mentioned I know “how to attract people like me onto this page” and “the worthless wankers who… criticize anything and everythin [sic] and they are the worst” — well, that would include you then wouldn’t it?
Have a super day.