Jur-ASS-ic World: Fallen Kingdom, Night of the Hunter

Jur-ASS-ic World: Fallen Kingdom
The second (or fifth, depending on how you count) entry in the Jurassic World series is just as dumb as the trailer would make you think. The island where the Jurassic World theme park is situated is about to experience a volcanic eruption so powerful it will decimate all life on the island, including the dinosaurs. Bryce Dallas Howard wants to rescue the dinosaurs, which seems like a pretty dumb fucking idea since every time the humans and the dinosaurs get together, it results in the dinosaurs eating the people. Chris Pratt thinks its a terrible idea, but since he needs a paycheck real bad, he goes along with her. What transpires next is a continuous chase sequence of humans outrunning dinosaurs, and then dinosaurs outrunning an unconvincing CGI volcanic explosion. Everyone survives, naturally.
The second half of the movie takes place in an isolated mansion where the rescued dinosaurs are auctioned off to people for various purposes, such as weaponizing them. The big attraction is a new dinosaur (every Jurassic Park movie tries to up the ante by introducing a new, scarier dinosaur) that is a genetic combination of a Velociraptor and the Indominus rex. Of course, in the previous movie, we learned that the Indominus rex was a genetic combination of a Tyrannosaurus rex and a Velociraptor, so the new new dinosaur is basically the same fucking thing except smaller and stupider looking. Howard and Pratt run away from the dinosaurs some more, and shout some insipid lines. The bad guys all get eaten. The end of the movie is supposed to be a shocking twist, but it’s pretty lame: the dinosaurs get free in southern California. Except they already did that in Jurassic Park 2. So, nothing is new in this franchise anymore. I think the worst part is that this movie serves no purpose except as an extended trailer for Jurassic World 3: Dinosaurs Up Your Ass in California. What a waste.
Verdict: Shitty
Night of the Hunter
It’s a shame that director Charles Laughton only got to direct a single film, Night of the Hunter, while so many idiots like Michael Bay and M. Night Shyamalan get chance after chance to churn out dreck. Laughton’s single attempt at film-making turned out a now-legendary film. Night of the Hunter is an interesting study of sociopathy and religious preoccupation, stemming primarily from the titular character as played by Robert Mitchum. The story is brilliant in its simplicity: a con-man is jailed in the same cell as a bank robber. Before his execution, the robber lets slip to the con-man that someone in his family knows the location of the money he stole and hid. Upon the con-man’s release, he goes to the town to win his way into the family’s graces so he can acquire the money.
Mitchum’s con-man is rather likeable on the surface, but has only the charming superficiality seen in sociopaths. Beneath the surface, he is a terrible misogynist, a serial killer, and will do anything to get what he wants without any remorse. He quickly earns everyone’s trust (except the children), so no one believes the children when they claim he is a murderer. The character study is enough to write an entire book about, and yet is only one aspect of what makes this film great. However, compared to Mitchum’s power-house performance, none of the other actors hold a candle to him. He acts circles around everyone else, and perhaps this was intended by Laughton, but I doubt it. Mitchum is just too good, and his excellence makes everyone else’s mediocrity more apparent. The only other actor who acquits herself is Lillian Gish, a former silent film star who managed to successfully transition to talkies. The child stars carry the weight of the film, and while their acting is about as good as I would expect from a 12 year-old and a 7 year-old, they perform nicely, and successfully form the emotional core of the film.
The only major gripe I have is the relative anti-climax of the film. The children escape from Mitchum in a harrowing scene, and of course he tracks them down sometime thereafter. It is at this second encounter that the movie just sort of stops. Mitchum easily gives up without much of a fight, whereas the scene could have very effectively been played for terror.
Night of the Hunter is expertly directed, and has no right to be this good being directed by a first-timer. It uses bold, contrasting shadows. It uses religious hymns to haunting effect. It uses unique shots and angles I have never seen in any other film. Laughton was a borderline genius director, but we’ll never know if he could have channeled that genius into further films, or if he just had beginner’s luck. Regardless, this is a really amazing film, and one that deserves to be watched by everyone. Regardless of a few shortcomings, Night of the Hunter is a classic of American cinema.
Verdict: Awesome

10 Responses to “Jur-ASS-ic World: Fallen Kingdom, Night of the Hunter”

  1. September 10, 2018 at 12:08 am

    I haven’t seen NOTH but I keep hearing great things. Thought Loughton was terrific in Mutiny On The Bounty so to watch something he’s directed is going to be fun.

    JurASSic World Fast & Furious was total garbage. It’s the kind of film I wouldn’t even waste time taking a dump on because I value my shit too much.

    • September 11, 2018 at 7:35 am

      You should watch NOTH, I think you would really enjoy it.

      And your line, “It’s the kind of film I wouldn’t even waste time taking a dump on because I value my shit too much,” is the greatest thing you have ever written. Lol! Thanks for the laugh.

  2. September 12, 2018 at 11:16 am

    Fallen Kingdom was such garbage! Ugh, it was annoyingly bad and totally just setting up what’s to come which seems equally bad. Let’s go to islands filled with dinos and watch people get picked off. I’m totally cool with that… we don’t need this apocalyptic shit.

    Night of the Hunter sounds so great. It has a similar premise to a Hitchcock film called Shadow of a Doubt that I really liked.

    • September 18, 2018 at 3:25 pm

      Fallen Kingdom is just the typical Hollywood part 2 of a planned trilogy garbage — completely pointless.

      I think you’d like NOTH. Any serious film aficionado should watch it. The directing alone is incredible. Check it out as soon as you can.

  3. 5 Tim
    November 13, 2018 at 6:01 am

    I remember seeing Le Samourai on TV in the 70s ago. It stayed with me and I only recently tracked it down. What a movie. Brilliant example of showing not telling. Your review is awesome.

  4. 7 chee
    December 17, 2018 at 6:14 pm

    but brik don’t you like chris pratt he is very charismatic and witty because he does not serious things he is joke he does the joke and it make a funny why do you not like the funny when joke happen brikhaus

    • March 22, 2019 at 1:50 pm


      • 9 chee
        March 22, 2019 at 1:56 pm

        But then why does the joke happen if you do not like the joke, joke is only hapen if hte jokeing is happening at you and as is of in order to f be able to make the joke into your brain patters that make that kaught

    • May 16, 2019 at 2:42 pm

      Brik like teh funny joke. But Brik not super smrat and dont get teh funy joke

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

September 2018
« Aug   Mar »


BrikHaus - Find me on Bloggers.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 410 other followers

%d bloggers like this: